EPA Testimony GHG Migration
The scientific case against man-made global warming has collapsed. A number of recent analyses of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), its science, its computer models, its review processes including the dubious selections of reviewers, have been shown to be mortally flawed. As Christopher Monckton recently observed:
"No serious scientist, therefore, can any longer take any of the IPCC's conclusions seriously for a single moment longer. As Lord Lawson of Blaby has long argued, the IPCC should now be abolished. It cannot serve any useful purpose in future, because it has dishonestly lent its support not merely to the falsification of scientific results but to the persistent maintenance of that falsification. The IPCC is finished." (http://tinyurl.com/6d279c).
To be very clear, my message is that the EPA should never, now or ever, be proposing mitigation of man-made CO2 on a body of "scientific" literature which is so flawed, unreplicated, indefensible, and dishonest.
Monckton has provided much more essential and detailed analyses of the scientific malpractices of the IPCC and its acolytes which are presented later in this document.