The International Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) sixth assessment report serves as the justification for many politicians to try and pass increasingly restrictive laws on society in the name of climate change. However, Andy May of the Climate Intelligence Foundation (CLINTEL) found many problems with the IPCC’s sixth assessment report. It made numerous false assumptions and flawed assessments, while ignoring facts and research that is should have considered in its report. May also found that The IPCC erred in its comparisons of present data with proxy data for past climate conditions, make flawed assumptions about climate sensitivity and emissions, and unjustifiably assumed nature plays not significant role in climate change.
In addition, the IPCC ignored or downplayed the tremendous benefits to human life of present climate change. May also found that the IPCC erred in its comparisons of present data with proxy data for past climate conditions, made flawed assumptions about climate sensitivity and emissions, and unjustifiably assumed nature does not play a significant role in climate change. In addition, the IPCC ignored or downplayed the tremendous benefits to human life of present climate change.
Andy May of CLINTEL joins host Anthony Watts and panelists H. Sterling Burnett and Linnea Lueken for this week’s episode of Climate Change Roundtable, live every Friday at 12pm CT. WATCH BELOW or here on YouTube or here on Rumble.
Anthony Watts is a senior fellow for environment and climate at The Heartland Institute.
H. Sterling Burnett, Ph.D., is the Director of the Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy and the managing editor of Environment & Climate News.
Linnea Lueken is a Research Fellow with the Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy.
