Opinion

Search/Filter

No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Maine

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a Maine-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $3.3 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhouse gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Minnesota

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a Minnesota-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $16.0 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhouse gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Virginia

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a Virginia-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $20.8 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhosue gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Florida

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a Florida-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $38.0 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhouse gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Illinois

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of an Illinois-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $46.1 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhouse gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on New York

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The like cost of a New York-only greenhosue gas program to consumers and businesses -- $53.8 billion -- can be divided by the number of househodls in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhosue gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Oregon

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of an Oregon-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $14.1 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhouse gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Tennessee

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a Tennessee-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $20.7 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhouse gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Wisconsin

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a Wisconsin-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $19.3 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhouse gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Connecticut

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a Connecticut-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $8.1 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhosue gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Montana

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a Montana-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $3.0 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhouse gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on New Jersey

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a New Jersey-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $25.1 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhouse gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Georgia

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a Georgia-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $28.7 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhouse gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Indiana

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of an Indiana-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $43.6 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhouse gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Kentucky

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a Kentucky-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $25.2 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhouse gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on North Carolina

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a North Carolina-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $22.7 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhosue gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Pennsylvania

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a Pennsylvania-only greenhosue gas program to consumers and businesses -- $54.0 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhosue gas program.
No. 101 – State Greenhouse Gas Programs: An Economic and Scientific Analysis: Impact on Utah

Published February 15, 2003

Opinion -
The likely cost of a Utah-only greenhouse gas program to consumers and businesses -- $12.0 billion -- can be divided by the number of households in the state to reveal the cost per household of a typical greenhouse gas program.
Please Don’t Poop in My Salad

Published February 13, 2003

Opinion -
Anti-smoking advocates sure know how to hurl insults at those who defend smokers’ rights.
Spend the evening with Heartland Senior Fellow Dr. Merrill Matthews!

Published February 10, 2003

Opinion -
Monday, February 24, 2003, 5-8 p.m. Mid-America Club 80th Floor - Aon Building, 200 East Randolph Drive, Chicago, Illinois Cash Bar Free Hors d’Oeuvres! Space is limited! For reservations, call The Heartland Institute, 312/377-4000.
Bush’s State of The Union Proposals On Health Care Will Fuel Debate

Published February 1, 2003

Opinion -
The debate between Democrats and Republicans over health care issues in 2003 promises to be more productive than it has been in quite some time.
Wood-burning Fireplaces May Be Banned in California

Published February 1, 2003

Opinion -
For more than a million California residents, December 24, 2002 may have been the last Christmas Eve during which they could cozy up to a fire and share a little holiday spirit.
Backyard Trash-burning a Major Source of Dioxin

Published February 1, 2003

Opinion -
A new publication by the Chlorine Chemistry Council, Backyard Trash Burning: The Wrong Answer, warns of the increasingly significant contribution of uncontrolled backyard trash-burning to pollutant levels.
No Apologies Needed for Driving an SUV

Published February 1, 2003

Opinion -
Americans like the environment. But the November 2002 elections demonstrated they don’t particularly like the advocacy groups that claim to speak for the “environmental movement.” Why?

Opinion

Heartland Newsletters