Dopey Internet Bill Hurts Kids

Published July 1, 2006

Social networking Web sites like MySpace, Friendster, and Facebook are becoming increasingly popular with the nation’s youth, prompting attempts to control the medium. Protecting children is the goal … but the outcome is too often the opposite.

Legislation recently proposed by Rep. Michael Fitzpatrick (R-PA) threatens to stop minors from accessing social networking sites in schools or libraries. His Deleting Online Predators Act (DOPA) would prohibit schools and libraries from allowing access to a commercial social networking Web site or chat room through which minors might be subject to sexual material or advances. For many kids, that amounts to a ban on using the sites from anywhere outside the home.

It’s true that the crowds of young, impressionable people on social networking sites have attracted child predators like bees to honey. Just last month Americans were shocked to discover that the deputy press secretary at the Department of Homeland Security, Brian Doyle, was arrested during an Internet sex sting. Doyle was a high-profile individual–and there are others like him.

Refocus and Engage

Child predators are a real and serious problem, but the answer isn’t to prohibit access for legitimate users. A better approach is first to refocus law enforcement so that the Internet is a normal place of patrol; and, second, to engage parents and businesses.

The best way to stop child predators is to teach kids how to protect themselves online. Parents and educators have a key role to play and numerous non-profits exist, such as and, to help spread safe practices. Children need to know dangers exist; more importantly, they should practice avoiding them.

It is incredibly important for kids to be safe online, but when laws like DOPA threaten to hinder communications in order to stop a few bad apples, everyone loses. Recall the fallout after implementation of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) in 2000. That law requires Web sites to obtain “verifiable parental consent” before collecting personal information from children under 13 years old.

The purpose was to protect kids, but instead the law created negative unintended consequences by cutting off good communications. For instance, popular television show “Thomas the Tank Engine” announced it would stop regular e-mail bulletin service because of the law and NBCi decided to close all e-mail accounts registered to kids under 13. There are many others cases of opportunities closed off, especially for poorer kids, because of the law.

Empower the Individual

Those supporting DOPA might want to consider that poor children rely more heavily on school and library Internet access than do their wealthier counterparts. Social networking sites have become so popular that they are a significant tool for socializing and learning from peers. Take that away from the underserved communities, and you have one more setback that will cause all sorts of problems, including crime, in the future.

Children need to be safe online, but the way to ensure their safety is not by cutting off their access to virtual playgrounds. In a free and open society, the best way to guard against threats is to empower individuals–especially children and parents. If kids do not gain experience in protecting themselves early on, they won’t be able to do it later. Lawmakers who truly want to protect kids should reject any proposals to ban their access to technology.

Sonia Arrison ([email protected]) is director of technology studies at the Pacific Research Institute. Reproduced with permission of TechNewsWorld and ECT News Network. Copyright 2006 all rights reserved.