Texas lawmakers are considering legislation to improve the treatment of direct primary care for state employees.
HB 3015 would allow workers’ direct primary care fees to count toward insurance deductibles in coverage under the state’s Employees Retirement System. More than 548,000 people were enrolled in these plans in 2024.
Primary care includes routine and preventative services such as annual check-ups, urgent care, chronic care management, and tests. In a direct primary care arrangement, the patient pays a membership fee of around $75 to $100 a month that allows unlimited access to a doctor, often same-day or next-day, and big discounts on tests, prescriptions, and other services. DPC providers do not bill insurance companies. Combined with high-deductible, low-cost insurance against catastrophic health problems, direct primary care provides low-cost, high-quality, personalized care while the separate insurance provides protection from financial disaster.
Applying direct primary care fees to insurance deductibles will encourage more state workers to take advantage of this beneficial approach to care.
The simple subscription payment approach of DPC eliminates the paperwork costs and rigid treatment rules that interfere in the doctor-patient relationship. U.S. physicians currently spend more than one-third of their work time on paperwork and other administrative tasks insurers require, according to the Medscape Physician Compensation Report for 2023. In addition, doctors spend more than half of every patient visit typing data into a computer, a prominent source of physician burnout. A March 2023 study in the Journal of Internal Medicine found 49.9 percent of health care workers met the criteria for burnout.
Direct primary care eliminates those problems, enabling doctors to take more time in examining patients and develop much greater knowledge of their conditions. DPC doctors also have a smaller patient load, generally around 400 to 600 (averaging 402), while physicians in traditional medical clinics can have 2,000 to 3,000 or more. The reduced paperwork burden for DPC doctors can save practices as much as 40 percent on their operating costs, savings they pass on to their patients through low membership fees.
Direct primary care also benefits patients by improving overall health outcomes, as the fixed-payment approach gives DPC doctors a financial stake in providing the most effective care because additional visits do not increase their revenue. “U.S. adults who regularly see a primary care physician have 33% lower health care costs and 19% lower odds of dying prematurely than those who see only a specialist,” says the Purchaser Business Group on Health. A five-year study published in the American Journal of Managed Care found Medicare patients who visited DPC doctors were 52 percent less likely to be hospitalized.
Applying direct primary care to deductibles for state employees’ health insurance will help those workers get truly affordable care in a timely manner, improve their health, greatly increase their access to doctors, and give them individualized treatment while freeing doctors from unnecessary, costly paperwork that does nothing to improve people’s health.
The following documents provide useful information about direct primary care.
“Direct fees paid to a direct primary care provider shall apply to the deductible of a participant enrolled in the basic coverage provided under the Employees Retirement System of Texas.”
The American Academy of Family Physicians Foundation provides a primer explaining direct primary care for patients and providers.
Personalized Preventive Care Leads to Significant Reductions in Hospital Utilization
This 2012 study in The American Journal of Managed Care reports that members of a personalized care plan “were approximately 42%, 47%, 54%, 58%, and 62% less likely to be hospitalized relative to nonmembers for the years 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively. By 2010, MDVIP hospital discharges for the Medicare population were 79% lower than the nonmember Medicare population, and this difference was shown to be trending up since 2006 (70% to 79%). A similar trend was seen in the non-Medicare population (49% to 72%).”
Burnout Related to Electronic Health Record Use in Primary Care
This 2023 study in the Journal of Primary Care & Community Health states, “Physician burnout has been increasing in the United States, especially in primary care, and the use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) is a prominent contributor.” Insurance and other third-party payers are responsible for the problem, the study shows: “Billing and documentation have been the primary drivers of EHR design, not patient needs and health management.”
Direct Primary Care: Saving Doctors from Burnout
Katherine Restrepo explains how direct primary care helps save doctors from burnout in this article from Forbes. “Doctors are happier once they realize that they can keep health care simple,” Restrepo writes. “There is actually a way to practice medicine without the government or administration walking into the exam room with the patient. This is what makes direct primary care a successful practice model.”
Primary care physicians in fee-for-service practices spend more than half their workday dealing with electronic health records, a study published in Annals of Family Medicine found. “During a typical 11.4-hour workday, primary care doctors spend 4.5 hours on EHR tasks while in the office and an additional 1.4 hours per day outside of clinic hours, in the early morning or after 6 p.m., including 51 minutes on the weekend,” the study states.
Direct Primary Care: Practice Distribution and Cost Across the Nation
Philip M. Eskew and Kathleen Klink describe the direct primary care (DPC) model; identify DPC practices across the United States; distinguish it from other practice arrangements such as concierge medicine; and evaluate data compiled from existing DPC practices across the United States to determine the cost advantages of DPC. Eskew and Klink confirm DPC practices’ lower price points and broad distribution, though data about quality were lacking at the time.
Nothing in this Research & Commentary is intended to influence the passage of legislation, and it does not necessarily represent the views of The Heartland Institute. For further information on this and other topics, visit the Health Care News website and The Heartland Institute’s website.
The Heartland Institute can send an expert to your state to testify or brief your caucus, host an event in your state, or send you further information on a topic. Please don’t hesitate to contact us if we can be of assistance! If you have any questions or comments, contact Heartland’s government relations team at [email protected] or 312/377-4000.
S. T. Karnick
S. T. Karnick is a Senior Fellow at The Heartland Institute.
S. T. Karnick is a senior fellow and director of publications for The Heartland Institute.
